![iridient developer 2 iridient developer 2](https://insmac.org/uploads/posts/2015-05/medium/1431250094_screen_71.png)
The Sigma files seem to be especially difficult perhaps just because they are so unique compared to most every other digital camera that is Bayer pattern based.Īll the troubles with getting the best quality out of Fuji's unique X-trans is yet another example where being different can make things more difficult for the 3rd party RAW processors. There is virtually an infinite set of possibilites there and I can test by trial and error and may have some sense of what is right and clearly not correct based on a decade of experience in dealing with undocumented RAW file formats, but it can still be a very difficult puzzle to crack. I'm not completely sure and probably never will be. The processing of these images are minimal. What you should do is try and spot the difference in the sharpness and details. which is the right one for which camera settings (aperture, ISO, focus distance, etc, etc, etc)? There will be differences in colour temperatures as there is no way of getting 2 images to line up perfectly from Iridient Developer and Lightroom, so I didn't even bother to try - it's irrelevant to this comparison. However, in this one "spatial gains" example there are some 37+ different pieces of metadata in the file. There is metadata that clearly seems to be applicable to the issue and without using this metadata (spatial gains) the color cast is much, much worse.
![iridient developer 2 iridient developer 2](https://www.fujirumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Iridient-X-Transformer-1536x791.jpg)
Current versions of Silkypix, Adobe Lightroom/ACR and Iridient Developer. They have not (yet) provided me with any sort of detailed documentation of their X3F metadata or any sort of information on how best to possibly incorporate X3F metadata into actual image processing routines.Īt this point after many years of working with the X3F format I think I have already figured out just about every metadata field that exists in these images (as far as reading and parsing the data), however how best to use some of that metadata may not always be obvious.įor example in the case of this particular lens color cast issue. Shadow Tone settings: The image on the left shows a SHADOW TONE +2 version. Actually turned out the information they provided was incorrect, out of date I think it was, and by the time they got it sorted out I had figured it out anyway.
#Iridient developer 2 update#
Long ago (several years ago I think.) Sigma did share some very basic file format information with me. Update - July 2017 - Please Note: I made this video 3 years ago and it references an old version of Iridient Developer. Iridient Developer is application designed for OS X.
#Iridient developer 2 full#
I just wondered whether or not they have given access to the same information to you? Here is a link to a full resolution, center cropped JPEG converted through Iridient Developer 2.2 with defaults and using RL Deconvolution sharpening method at 0. I saw in an earlier post (Lightroom thread), it was stated that Sigma have "shared" their X3F information with Adobe (not sure whether it was specific to the recent Merrill sensor?). Iridient Developer gives advanced photographers total control over their digital photographs, yet still provides easy drag and drop batch conversion and access to basic adjustments for the.
#Iridient developer 2 for mac os#
I'll have more time to look through some of my earlier SD1M pics that showed the magenta cast when I get back from work. Iridient Developer 3.2.2 macOS 14 mb Iridient Developer is a powerful RAW image conversion application designed and optimized specifically for Mac OS X.